As we observe Cybersecurity Awareness Month this October, a recent and alarming cyber incident is a stark reminder that digital security is a concern not just for businesses and governments but for every individual. The reported breach of major US telecom companies by Chinese hackers has thrown into sharp focus the vital importance of robust encryption for all internet users; the security measures protecting corporate and government systems are intrinsically linked to the privacy and safety of individual consumers. As we delve into the implications of this breach, it becomes clear that strong encryption is not merely an option but a necessity for everyone in the digital age.

In an age when our digital lives are intertwined with nearly every aspect of our existence, the importance of robust encryption cannot be overstated, and attempts to weaken it could have dire consequences.

Politicians and law enforcement agencies repeat the fallacy of “safe” backdoors, often pushing for what they see as a compromise: strong encryption with a unique access point for the “good guys.” However, advocates of this approach needs to understand the nature of digital security. Once a backdoor exists, it’s only a matter of time before it’s discovered and exploited—not just by law enforcement but also by malicious actors.

The dangers of backdoors aren’t theoretical. A recent report from the Wall Street Journal provides a chilling real-world example of what can go wrong when secure systems have built-in access points.

According to the report, a team of hackers associated with the Chinese government gained access to critical infrastructure belonging to major US telecom companies. This breach is particularly alarming because the hackers exploited systems designed for lawful wiretapping requests.

The “backdoor” for US law enforcement became a wide-open gate for foreign intelligence services. The hackers potentially accessed these systems for months or longer, engaging in what’s been described as “a vast collection of internet traffic,” affecting millions of Americans. The gravity of the situation is underscored by the US government’s assessment of the breach as “historically significant and worrisome.”

This incident perfectly illustrates why security experts and companies like Apple are adamant about not creating backdoors. What was intended as a tool for lawful surveillance became a massive security vulnerability exploited by a foreign power.

For years, Apple has been at the forefront of implementing strong encryption in its products, particularly the iPhone. Despite pressure from Western governments to create backdoors for law enforcement, Apple has steadfastly refused. Their stance is clear: Robust security and privacy are non-negotiable features of their products.

This position isn’t just about selling phones and protecting consumers. Many security experts argue that a “safe” backdoor is a dangerous myth. As Apple rightly points out, you can’t have strong security with a built-in weakness. Any backdoor, no matter how well-intentioned, is a vulnerability waiting to be exploited.

Now, let’s bring this back to the average consumer. You might think, “I’m not a criminal, so why should I care about encryption?” The answer is simple: Your data are valuable and constantly at risk.

Consider your smartphone. It’s not just a communication device; it’s a repository of your entire digital life. Your emails, photos, financial information, and personal messages are all stored there. Strong encryption ensures that your data remains protected if your phone is lost or stolen.

But strong encryption goes beyond just device security. It protects online banking, secure messaging, and countless other digital interactions. In an era of increasing cyber threats, encryption is your first and often last line of defense against identity theft, financial fraud, and privacy invasions.

The broader implications are that this hack demonstrates another crucial point: Weaknesses in encryption don’t just affect individuals; they can have national security implications. When consumer products and services are compromised, it’s not just personal data at stake—it’s potentially sensitive business and government information.

Ultimately, debates about encryption aren’t just technical discussions; they’re fundamentally about balancing security, privacy, and law enforcement needs in the digital age. And as the telecom hack shows, attempts to tilt this balance in favor of surveillance can backfire spectacularly. We need strong, uncompromised encryption. As consumers, we should support companies and policies prioritizing robust security and privacy.

Remember, in the digital world, your data are only as secure as the encryption protecting them. In an age when our lives are increasingly digital, strong encryption isn’t just a feature; it’s a necessity. Let’s ensure it stays that way.

Learn more: The Broadband Dilemma | AI’s Corporate Takeover? | Jawboning: Weighing Government Influence over Online Platforms’ Censorship Practices | Can We Childproof the Internet?