Skip to main content

Research Archive

Welcome to Our Research Archive

Search and filter by content type, issue area, author, and keyword

August 16, 2016

Renewable Electricity as a Solution to Puerto Rico Debt Crisis? You Must Be Kidding

The Beltway lobbying machine is nothing if not inventive. The latest evidence for this eternal truth is a new report from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis arguing that the debt restructuring plan recently hammered out for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) will not work as intended, in substantial part because it…

August 15, 2016

Mark J. Perry on Nuclear Power

It is hot. It is humid. Even sound intellects have trouble maintaining focus in the dog days of Beltway August, a phenomenon illustrated recently by my esteemed colleague and good friend, Mark J. Perry. An absolutely solid economist. AEI scholar. University of Michigan professor. General Secretary of Carpe Diem, hands down the most useful and interesting policy…

August 8, 2016

More Regulatory Magic from the EPA

I wrote recently about the manipulation of benefit/cost analysis by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and more generally about the adverse implications of the evolution of the federal bureaucracy into an interest group driven by both budget and ideological imperatives. This reality now emerges frequently, with little effort to hide it, the most recent example of which is an…

August 1, 2016

Missing the Forest for the Trees on Solar Net Metering

In a recent essay on the solar photovoltaic (PV or “rooftop”) power market, Mark Muro and Devashree Saha of the Brookings Institute applaud the net metering system of subsidizing such rooftop installations, concluding that the system is a “net benefit” for both the recipients and the non-recipients of the subsidy; that is, for all power consumers. The…

June 30, 2016

Springtime for the Rockefellers

The weather warms. The flowers bloom. The garden parties begin anew, and nothing is worse than waiting day after agonizing day for invitations that never come. So why not make an early bid for the most prestigious gatherings, by making a gesture simultaneously empty, loud, in tune with right-minded thinking, and utterly hypocritical? Dianne Ingram…

June 27, 2016

Is the Nuclear Liability Limit a Subsidy, or Not?

The heat is on. I refer not to the beginning of summer, nor the looming global warming apocalypse for which there is little evidence, nor an election season sure to be characterized by personal attacks aplenty. But instead, the increasing difficulty of defending the absurd argument that the massive explicit and implicit subsidies given wind and solar power and ethanol production yield environmental improvement and…

June 20, 2016

Nothing New Under the Sun as FTC Seeks to Expand Power over Solar

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced recently a workshop to be held on June 21, with the title “Something New Under the Sun: Competition and Consumer Protection Issues in Solar Power.” Accompanying the announcement is a discussion paper presenting a number of issues for public comment. The analytic quality of that paper is highly uneven, but for now it…

June 15, 2016

Four Decades of Subsidy Rationales for Uncompetitive Energy

The modern rationales for energy subsidies have varied in prominence over the decades, but none has been broadly discredited in the public discussion despite the reality that each suffers from fundamental analytic weaknesses. The rationales can be summarized as follows: Given the weak history of analytic rigor and policy success in the context of energy…

June 9, 2016

Comment for the Federal Trade Commission: Competition and Consumer Protection Issues in Solar Power

This note responds to the FTC request for public comment attendant upon the workshop scheduled for June 21, 2016 on the topic “Competition and Consumer Protection Issues in Solar Power,” as described on the FTC website, and detailed in a pdf document with that title. That document here is referenced as “the FTC discussion paper.” Read the PDF.

June 6, 2016

The Magic of the EPA’s Benefit/cost Analysis

Benefit/cost analysis: It sounds so scientific, so rational, so impartial. So sound as a tool with which to resolve conflicting assertions about the wisdom of regulatory proposals. So divorced from partisanship or ideological influence. A truck engine is tested for pollution exiting its exhaust pipe in California. REUTERS/Mike Blake Oh, please. Democracy is the art…